How The Historical Sense Of Ancient India Is Different From Classical World?

 How The Historical Sense Of Ancient India Is Different From Classical World?

The study of ancient Indian history is important for those who wish to understand the true nature of the past, as well as for those who seek to understand the nature of the obstacles hindering the progress of India as a nation. Both ancient Indian tradition and classical historiography are valuable in themselves. 

Many ancient Indian historians have stated that, despite the variety of Brahmanic, Buddhist and Jain texts, there is not a single work that can be compared with the history of Herodotus, Thucydides, Polybius On a par. Greek, Livy's Almanac or Tacitus. Rimsky. In their view, ancient Indian literature has little historical and chronological significance compared with European literature and should be avoided. According to the ancient Greek and Roman historians mentioned above, only political stories are published, while the stories of ancient Indian historians cover all areas of history including social and economic history, politics, religion and culture. 

Indian nationalist historians of the early 20th century tended to exaggerate the glories of the past, but nevertheless introduced contradictions into historical interpretation, which in turn led to more accurate studies of Indian institutions. European scholars who reconstructed the early history of India in the 19th century considered it to be essentially static, and Indian society was only interested in spiritual things. 

Prior to the twentieth century, for example, historians believed that Indian history began in the second millennium BC, when a people known as the In-do-Aryans migrated to the Indian subcontinent and created a new civilization. It was preceded by the Vedic era, when tribal societies of Indo-European origin, led by warlike leaders, settled in northern India. The Classical era was marked by the revival of urban civilization in ancient India, and with it the written culture. 

Ancient India at the time of the Buddha was a classic era in Indian history when literacy and urban civilization reappeared in the Indian subcontinent a thousand years after his death. Ancient India at the time of the Buddha witnessed the development of a religious culture from which three distinct religions arose - Hinduism, Jainism and Buddhism. These contradictions had a profound creative impact on the religious life of ancient India, giving rise to two new religions: Jainism and Buddhism. 

The traditional Vedic religion was communal and well suited to small tribal societies, but less so to the larger and more complex societies that emerged in ancient India during this historical period. The origins of the Vedic tradition in India, still practiced today, can now be traced, at least in part, to the indigenous peoples of ancient settlements such as Balatal and their interaction and fusion with the culture of the Aryan migrants who arrived in the region between C. 2000-c. 1500 BCE, the beginning of the so-called Vedic period (c. 1500–500 BCE), during which the Hindu scriptures known as the Vedas were preserved in writing. Despite the emergence of urban cultures in the Indus Valley in 2500 BC, until the 7th-6th centuries. BC. there is no definite chronology of Indian history. and much of what we know comes from the writings of Greek visitors such as Megasthenes (c. 

As was the case in ancient Mesopotamia and Egypt, the story is based on Paleolithic foragers who migrated to the region, followed by Neolithic farmers who settled in the villages. The Late Vedic differs from the Early Vedic in that during these centuries the lands along the Ganges were colonized by the Aryans, whose political, economic, social and religious life became more complex. South Asian Geography The dynamic history of India thus alternated between periods in which the subcontinent was partly unified by empires, and periods in which it consisted of ever-changing regional states. 

Some of them were located in northern India, along the Ganges River, but others first grew in the south, on the Indian peninsula. Finally, during the ancient and medieval period, India flourished as a civilization due to its dynamic economy. The Indians played a crucial role in the development of the ancient global world system, especially in the important maritime trade policy of India's south coast. 

This fact testifies to the growing trade links between India and the Middle East during this period of Indian history. Undoubtedly, the most impressive finds of the Mediterranean trade with India come from excavations undertaken in 1941-1950 and renewed in 1989-1992 at Arikamedu near Pondicherry on the southeast coast of India. Probably identified as the ancient port of Poduque, a trading settlement from the late Hellenistic and early Roman periods has been discovered at the site. 

The fact that billions of people today practice religions that originated in ancient India is not the only significance of Indian civilization during this period. But this civilization was not created by one nation, one race or one nation, and it makes no sense to see the history of India as the history of the Indian people. The influence of ancient Indian history on the modern world is due to the many manifestations of Indian genius, and the language used by people so logically that it inspires critical thinking about the fundamental unity that underlies human diversity. 

The spread of Buddhism from India can be used to illustrate the connection of the regions of the world in ancient times. The four major religions of the world - Hinduism, Sikhism, Buddhism and Jainism - originated in India. 

At the same time, the plurality of Indian traditions and their respective social and political influence can be underscored by a discussion of the role of Jainism and Buddhism (which also represented resistance to Brahminic authority in Hinduism and therefore were anti-caste in nature). in the formation of the Mauryan state in India. At the same time, one might wonder how Buddhism challenged Hindu society in classical India in the same way that it challenged the Confucian state in China. More recently, historians have reconstructed the subcontinent's social, economic, and cultural history in greater detail, although politics have continued to influence the study of Indian history. 

In addition, he claims that there were historical documents in ancient India, such as Puranic documents, as well as other works of a mixed historical nature. All of his claims are correct, except that there was no historian in ancient India, historical events are not documented, and chronology is completely absent from ancient Indian literature.